QuARRy Home

Search Results

Filter by

Quality Matters – QM   QM General Standard 5

Rubric

More Filters

Material Type

Institution

11–15 of 68 results
sort by: title | date created | date added

Role of Instructor Participation

Syllabus – Role of Instructor Participation
Syllabus
Role of Instructor Participation
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.3
California State University, Northridge
Amber Norwood, an Instructor from CSU Northridge, includes specific information in the syllabus about their role regarding participation in the course by including detailed Discussion Facilitation and Participation Guidelines.

Collaborative Jamboard Activity

Discussion – Collaborative Jamboard Activity
Discussion
Collaborative Jamboard Activity
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.2
QM General Standard 6: Course Technology
QM Standard 6.3
California State University, San Marcos
Kim McCarthy, an Instructor from CSU San Marcos, uses Google Jamboard for class collaboration. Students respond to the question prompt posted on the Jamboard. They then interact with each other by posting a picture, drawing, text, or a "stickie note" in response to the prompt.

Structured Group Discussions Providing Roleplaying & Choice

Discussion – Structured Group Discussions Providing Roleplaying & Choice
Discussion
Structured Group Discussions Providing Roleplaying & Choice
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.4
California State University, Fresno
Ryan Ditchfield, an Instructor at Fresno State, creatively organizes group discussions providing students an opportunity to self-assign themselves to a group discussion topic that interest them in his "Eyewitness Identification-FTB 159T" class. In the group discussions they have the choice to pick a role - Researcher, Eyewitness, Defense Attorney, Police Officer, Suspect, and Timekeeper and throughout the semester the students will also be changing to a different group and also change their role. This example represents student choice and group roles in discussions.

Group Annotation Discussion Using Perusall

Discussion – Group Annotation Discussion Using Perusall
Discussion
Group Annotation Discussion Using Perusall
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.2, QM Standard 5.4
QM General Standard 6: Course Technology
QM Standard 6.1, QM Standard 6.3
California State University, Bakersfield
Natalie Thompson, an Instructor from CSU Bakersfield, shares a peer to peer annotation activity using the tool Perusall where students read and annotate a scholarly article. Detailed instructions are provided for the students about the discussion requirements.

Jamboard for Facilitating a Complex Chemistry Article

Discussion – Jamboard for Facilitating a Complex Chemistry Article
Discussion
Jamboard for Facilitating a Complex Chemistry Article
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.2
QM General Standard 6: Course Technology
QM Standard 6.1, QM Standard 6.3
California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Instructor Chantel Stieber from Cal Poly Pomona, uses a Google Jamboard for students to contribute using text, drawings, or images their understanding of a complex scientific article.