QuARRy Home

Search Results

Filter by

Quality Matters – QM   QM General Standard 5

Rubric

More Filters

Material Type

Institution

56–60 of 69 results
sort by: title | date created | date added

Small Group Discussion for Synchronous Webconference Class Session

Discussion – Small Group Discussion for Synchronous Webconference Class Session
Discussion
Small Group Discussion for Synchronous Webconference Class Session
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.2
QM General Standard 6: Course Technology
QM Standard 6.1, QM Standard 6.3
California State University, San Bernardino
Cheryl Brandt, an Instructor at CSU San Bernardino, uses a problem-based seminar discussion prompt during synchronous sessions in Zoom to increase peer-to-peer interaction. During the sessions, each small group captures their plan for sharing with the entire class using Jamboard.

Structured Group Discussions Providing Roleplaying & Choice

Discussion – Structured Group Discussions Providing Roleplaying & Choice
Discussion
Structured Group Discussions Providing Roleplaying & Choice
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.4
California State University, Fresno
Ryan Ditchfield, an Instructor at Fresno State, creatively organizes group discussions providing students an opportunity to self-assign themselves to a group discussion topic that interest them in his "Eyewitness Identification-FTB 159T" class. In the group discussions they have the choice to pick a role - Researcher, Eyewitness, Defense Attorney, Police Officer, Suspect, and Timekeeper and throughout the semester the students will also be changing to a different group and also change their role. This example represents student choice and group roles in discussions.

Student Learning Objective Alignment Matrix

Assessment Tool – Student Learning Objective Alignment Matrix
Assessment Tool
Student Learning Objective Alignment Matrix
QM General Standard 2: Learning Objectives (Competencies)
QM Standard 2.1, QM Standard 2.2, QM Standard 2.4
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.1
California State University, Bakersfield
Allison Evans, an Instructor from CSU Bakersfield, provides a detailed alignment matrix that illustrates the alignment of course objectives, materials, activities with student learning objectives.

Syllabus - Alignment Chart

Syllabus – Syllabus - Alignment Chart
Syllabus
Syllabus - Alignment Chart
QM General Standard 2: Learning Objectives (Competencies)
QM Standard 2.4
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.1
San Jose State University
Maureen Smith, an Instructor at San Jose State University, provides an alignment matrix that aligns the weekly activities with the course level objectives. The matrix provides the assignments, points, percent of the total, minimum number of words, and affiliated learning outcomes.

Synthesis Assignment: Charting Where the Authors Intersect

Discussion – Synthesis Assignment: Charting Where the Authors Intersect
Discussion
Synthesis Assignment: Charting Where the Authors Intersect
QM General Standard 4: Instructional Materials
QM Standard 4.5
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.2
QM General Standard 6: Course Technology
QM Standard 6.3
California State University, San Bernardino
Kathryn Hansler, an Instructor at CSU San Bernardino, developed an assignment for a First Year Composition course that takes place after several lessons on synthesis and close readings of 2 texts. This assignment is used to help prepare students for an essay where they develop their own theory on the issue of news media objectivity.