QuARRy Home

Search Results

Filter by

Quality Matters – QM   QM General Standard 5

Rubric

More Filters

Material Type

Institution

36–40 of 76 results
sort by: title | date created | date added

Lab Assignment Connecting Students to Their Community

Assignment – Lab Assignment Connecting Students to Their Community
Assignment
Lab Assignment Connecting Students to Their Community
QM General Standard 2: Learning Objectives (Competencies)
QM Standard 2.4
QM General Standard 3: Assessment and Measurement
QM Standard 3.1, QM Standard 3.3, QM Standard 3.4
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.1
California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Weimin Li, an Instructor from Cal Poly Pomona, developed a module lab assignment. This lab assignment includes includes an activity with students exploring the hardware and software that they will use in a GIS lab. The activity has students using a database from LA county to apply mapping skills.

Journalism Ethics Scenarios

Assignment – Journalism Ethics Scenarios
Assignment
Journalism Ethics Scenarios
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.2
California State University, Fresno
Instructor Timothy Drachlis from Fresno State, created an exercise and discussion whereby students learn more about journalism ethics. Working in groups, students select from 5 scenarios where they collaboratively develop a presentation using lectures, readings, and research as they apply the code of ethics to their respective scenario.

Matrix of Alignment of Module Objectives & Assignments

Syllabus – Matrix of Alignment of Module Objectives & Assignments
Syllabus
Matrix of Alignment of Module Objectives & Assignments
QM General Standard 2: Learning Objectives (Competencies)
QM Standard 2.4
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.1
California State University, San Marcos
Sarah Jayyousi, an Instructor at CSU San Marcos, shares a matrix of student learning outcomes and assignments that are within the syllabus.

Peer Part Planning

Discussion – Peer Part Planning
Discussion
Peer Part Planning
QM General Standard 2: Learning Objectives (Competencies)
QM Standard 2.4
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.1, QM Standard 5.2
California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Patrick Mannion, an Instructor at Cal Poly Pomona, teaches students how to best use 3D CAD modeling software in their course. Each assignment requires a large amount of planning and forethought before starting to make a model. To help address this issue, the Peer Part Planning assignment breaks students into small groups and has them come up with a basic plan/outline for how they can approach the creation of the model.

Peer-to-Peer Engagement using Twitter

Discussion – Peer-to-Peer Engagement using Twitter
Discussion
Peer-to-Peer Engagement using Twitter
QM General Standard 4: Instructional Materials
QM Standard 4.5
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.2
QM General Standard 6: Course Technology
QM Standard 6.3
California State University, San Bernardino
Elisabeth Anderson, an Instructor from CSU San Bernardino, created an activity designed to promote active learning and peer-to-peer engagement. Students are asked to read up on genetic testing from a website provided to them. Then they engage in a Twitter discussion about the pros and cons of the technology.