QuARRy Home

Search Results

Filter by

Quality Matters – QM   QM General Standard 6 QM 6.1 Discussion

Rubric

More Filters

Material Type

Institution

1–3 of 3 results for: art
sort by: title | date created | date added

Group Annotation Discussion Using Perusall

Discussion – Group Annotation Discussion Using Perusall
Discussion
Group Annotation Discussion Using Perusall
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.2, QM Standard 5.4
QM General Standard 6: Course Technology
QM Standard 6.1, QM Standard 6.3
California State University, Bakersfield
Natalie Thompson, an Instructor from CSU Bakersfield, shares a peer to peer annotation activity using the tool Perusall where students read and annotate a scholarly article. Detailed instructions are provided for the students about the discussion requirements.

Jamboard for Facilitating a Complex Chemistry Article

Discussion – Jamboard for Facilitating a Complex Chemistry Article
Discussion
Jamboard for Facilitating a Complex Chemistry Article
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.2
QM General Standard 6: Course Technology
QM Standard 6.1, QM Standard 6.3
California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Instructor Chantel Stieber from Cal Poly Pomona, uses a Google Jamboard for students to contribute using text, drawings, or images their understanding of a complex scientific article.

Perusall Activity

Discussion – Perusall Activity
Discussion
Perusall Activity
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.2
QM General Standard 6: Course Technology
QM Standard 6.1, QM Standard 6.3
California State University, Dominguez Hills
Terri Fleming-Dright, an Instructor from CSU Dominguez Hills, used the software Perusall to discuss a class reading. The opportunity to create starter posts and ask students questions that they can then respond to and each other is an excellent way of fostering active learning.