QuARRy Home

Search Results

Filter by

Quality Matters – QM   QM General Standard 5 Discussion

Rubric

More Filters

Material Type

Institution

6–10 of 18 results
sort by: title | date created | date added

Jamboard for Facilitating a Complex Chemistry Article

Discussion – Jamboard for Facilitating a Complex Chemistry Article
Discussion
Jamboard for Facilitating a Complex Chemistry Article
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.2
QM General Standard 6: Course Technology
QM Standard 6.1, QM Standard 6.3
California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Instructor Chantel Stieber from Cal Poly Pomona, uses a Google Jamboard for students to contribute using text, drawings, or images their understanding of a complex scientific article.

Wellness Check Discussion

Discussion – Wellness Check Discussion
Discussion
Wellness Check Discussion
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.3
California State University, Fresno
Kathaleen Valdez, an Instructor from Fresno State, uses a brief weekly discussion to help facilitate a line of communication between the student and the instructor by providing a way for students to check-in. The discussion encourages them to let the instructor know how they are doing in regards to the class or just life. It helps them know that there is someone else out there that has their back and is concerned about how they are doing and lets the instructor know if there is a need to contact the student for additional assistance. In addition, the discussion can be used as a way to monitor student participation.

Peer Part Planning

Discussion – Peer Part Planning
Discussion
Peer Part Planning
QM General Standard 2: Learning Objectives (Competencies)
QM Standard 2.4
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.1, QM Standard 5.2
California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Patrick Mannion, an Instructor at Cal Poly Pomona, teaches students how to best use 3D CAD modeling software in their course. Each assignment requires a large amount of planning and forethought before starting to make a model. To help address this issue, the Peer Part Planning assignment breaks students into small groups and has them come up with a basic plan/outline for how they can approach the creation of the model.

Peer-to-Peer Engagement using Twitter

Discussion – Peer-to-Peer Engagement using Twitter
Discussion
Peer-to-Peer Engagement using Twitter
QM General Standard 4: Instructional Materials
QM Standard 4.5
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.2
QM General Standard 6: Course Technology
QM Standard 6.3
California State University, San Bernardino
Elisabeth Anderson, an Instructor from CSU San Bernardino, created an activity designed to promote active learning and peer-to-peer engagement. Students are asked to read up on genetic testing from a website provided to them. Then they engage in a Twitter discussion about the pros and cons of the technology.

EdPuzzle Copy of Your Brain On Adderall - The Study Drug

Discussion – EdPuzzle Copy of Your Brain On Adderall - The Study Drug
Discussion
EdPuzzle Copy of Your Brain On Adderall - The Study Drug
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.2
QM General Standard 6: Course Technology
QM Standard 6.1, QM Standard 6.3
California State University, Fresno
Instructor Edward Boyle from Fresno State, uses EdPuzzle to promote discussion and student engagement using open-ended questions.