QuARRy Home

Search Results

Filter by

Quality Matters – QM  

Rubric

More Filters

Material Type

Institution

96–100 of 210 results
sort by: title | date created | date added

General Discussion Rubric

Assessment Tool – General Discussion Rubric
Assessment Tool
General Discussion Rubric
QM General Standard 3: Assessment and Measurement
QM Standard 3.1, QM Standard 3.3, QM Standard 3.4
California State University, Fullerton
Instructor Krista Hahn, from CSU Fullerton, created this rubric to assess student discussions. This rubric is intended for a a 2-week discussion where an original post is due during the first week, and two replies to peers are due during the second week. It is reasonably general so that it can be used for multiple discussions across a semester.

How You'll Use It - Pauling's Rules

Assessment Tool – How You'll Use It - Pauling's Rules
Assessment Tool
How You'll Use It - Pauling's Rules
QM General Standard 3: Assessment and Measurement
QM Standard 3.1, QM Standard 3.3, QM Standard 3.4
California State University, Fresno
Keith Putrika, an Instructor at Fresno State, developed a summative assessment where students apply Pauling's Rules and related concepts in mineralogy, to assess an environmental issue that might mimic the ways in which the concepts could be used in practice. The accompanying grading rubric includes percentages for the characteristics as well as a letter grade for the corresponding criteria.

Matrix of Alignment of Module Objectives & Assignments

Syllabus – Matrix of Alignment of Module Objectives & Assignments
Syllabus
Matrix of Alignment of Module Objectives & Assignments
QM General Standard 2: Learning Objectives (Competencies)
QM Standard 2.4
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.1
California State University, San Marcos
Sarah Jayyousi, an Instructor at CSU San Marcos, shares a matrix of student learning outcomes and assignments that are within the syllabus.

Peer-to-Peer Engagement using Twitter

Discussion – Peer-to-Peer Engagement using Twitter
Discussion
Peer-to-Peer Engagement using Twitter
QM General Standard 4: Instructional Materials
QM Standard 4.5
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.2
QM General Standard 6: Course Technology
QM Standard 6.3
California State University, San Bernardino
Elisabeth Anderson, an Instructor from CSU San Bernardino, created an activity designed to promote active learning and peer-to-peer engagement. Students are asked to read up on genetic testing from a website provided to them. Then they engage in a Twitter discussion about the pros and cons of the technology.

Assignment Using Transparent Assignment Design and Mind Mapping

Assignment – Assignment Using Transparent Assignment Design and Mind Mapping
Assignment
Assignment Using Transparent Assignment Design and Mind Mapping
QM General Standard 4: Instructional Materials
QM Standard 4.1, QM Standard 4.2
QM General Standard 6: Course Technology
QM Standard 6.2
California State University, Los Angeles
Margaret Finnegan, an Instructor from CSU Los Angeles, shares an information literacy project in which students choose a topic related to a criminal justice career that they would like to learn more about and find sources to support their opinion. The assignment description uses the “Transparent Assignment Design” template which makes learning more explicit for students. It also offers a different way to demonstrate mastery with students creating a mind-map created with bubbl.us.