QuARRy Home

Search Results

Filter by

Quality Matters – QM   QM General Standard 5

Rubric

More Filters

Material Type

Institution

31–35 of 69 results
sort by: title | date created | date added

Peer Part Planning

Discussion – Peer Part Planning
Discussion
Peer Part Planning
QM General Standard 2: Learning Objectives (Competencies)
QM Standard 2.4
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.1, QM Standard 5.2
California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Patrick Mannion, an Instructor at Cal Poly Pomona, teaches students how to best use 3D CAD modeling software in their course. Each assignment requires a large amount of planning and forethought before starting to make a model. To help address this issue, the Peer Part Planning assignment breaks students into small groups and has them come up with a basic plan/outline for how they can approach the creation of the model.

Fashion Analysis

Assignment – Fashion Analysis
Assignment
Fashion Analysis
QM General Standard 2: Learning Objectives (Competencies)
QM Standard 2.4
QM General Standard 3: Assessment and Measurement
QM Standard 3.1, QM Standard 3.3, QM Standard 3.4
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.1
California State University, Fresno
Lizhu Davis, an Instructor at Fresno State, created an assignment which includes; 1) the purpose and learning objectives of the assignment, 2) streamlined the guideline to give students a clearer instruction, and 3) a well developed grading rubric. Students are also given choice around how they want to approach the assignment.

Journalism Ethics Scenarios

Assignment – Journalism Ethics Scenarios
Assignment
Journalism Ethics Scenarios
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.2
California State University, Fresno
Instructor Timothy Drachlis from Fresno State, created an exercise and discussion whereby students learn more about journalism ethics. Working in groups, students select from 5 scenarios where they collaboratively develop a presentation using lectures, readings, and research as they apply the code of ethics to their respective scenario.

Matrix of Alignment of Module Objectives & Assignments

Syllabus – Matrix of Alignment of Module Objectives & Assignments
Syllabus
Matrix of Alignment of Module Objectives & Assignments
QM General Standard 2: Learning Objectives (Competencies)
QM Standard 2.4
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.1
California State University, San Marcos
Sarah Jayyousi, an Instructor at CSU San Marcos, shares a matrix of student learning outcomes and assignments that are within the syllabus.

Peer-to-Peer Engagement using Twitter

Discussion – Peer-to-Peer Engagement using Twitter
Discussion
Peer-to-Peer Engagement using Twitter
QM General Standard 4: Instructional Materials
QM Standard 4.5
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.2
QM General Standard 6: Course Technology
QM Standard 6.3
California State University, San Bernardino
Elisabeth Anderson, an Instructor from CSU San Bernardino, created an activity designed to promote active learning and peer-to-peer engagement. Students are asked to read up on genetic testing from a website provided to them. Then they engage in a Twitter discussion about the pros and cons of the technology.