QuARRy Home

Search Results

Filter by

Quality Matters – QM   QM General Standard 6 Discussion

Rubric

More Filters

Material Type

Institution

6–10 of 17 results
sort by: title | date created | date added

Peer-to-Peer Engagement using Twitter

Discussion – Peer-to-Peer Engagement using Twitter
Discussion
Peer-to-Peer Engagement using Twitter
QM General Standard 4: Instructional Materials
QM Standard 4.5
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.2
QM General Standard 6: Course Technology
QM Standard 6.3
California State University, San Bernardino
Elisabeth Anderson, an Instructor from CSU San Bernardino, created an activity designed to promote active learning and peer-to-peer engagement. Students are asked to read up on genetic testing from a website provided to them. Then they engage in a Twitter discussion about the pros and cons of the technology.

Assignment using Perusall

Discussion – Assignment using Perusall
Discussion
Assignment using Perusall
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.2
QM General Standard 6: Course Technology
QM Standard 6.1
California State University, Fresno
Donald Henriques, an Instructor at Fresno State, uses the social annotation tool Perusall to encourage interactive reading.

Preparing and Brainstorming for Experiential Lab Group Activity

Discussion – Preparing and Brainstorming for Experiential Lab Group Activity
Discussion
Preparing and Brainstorming for Experiential Lab Group Activity
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.2
QM General Standard 6: Course Technology
QM Standard 6.3
California State University, Fresno
Professor Emerita Betty Garcia from Fresno State, developed a small group activity where students are asked to brainstorm about "possible" "presenting problems" that would be brought to a group with the identified focus (i.e., graduate student stress) using Zoom breakout rooms. The purpose of this activity is to reflect on the role they will take in the group and in preparing and planning for the class lab group activity. The multi-sequence activity involves students thinking about options and choosing one. Possible presenting problems are posted on Jamboard for all students to review and factor into their decision-making about what "presenting problem" will be theirs.

Perusall Activity

Discussion – Perusall Activity
Discussion
Perusall Activity
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.2
QM General Standard 6: Course Technology
QM Standard 6.1, QM Standard 6.3
California State University, Dominguez Hills
Terri Fleming-Dright, an Instructor from CSU Dominguez Hills, used the software Perusall to discuss a class reading. The opportunity to create starter posts and ask students questions that they can then respond to and each other is an excellent way of fostering active learning.

Active Learning Using PlayPosit

Discussion – Active Learning Using PlayPosit
Discussion
Active Learning Using PlayPosit
QM General Standard 5: Learning Activities and Learner Interaction
QM Standard 5.2
QM General Standard 6: Course Technology
QM Standard 6.3
California State University, Fresno
Instructor Negin Tahvildary from Fresno State, uses PlayPosit to turn a class lecture into active learning with embedded question prompts. In the clip, student find their default communication style and compare and contrast the advantages and disadvantages of each style.